
Short answer: we tested 19 construction company websites on a phone. Only 2 showed their main content in 2.5 seconds or less, which is Google’s line for a good load, and 12 took more than 10 seconds. 13 of 19 have a tap-to-call link, only 5 have a form on the homepage, and none has chat. The construction websites worth copying load fast, say what they build and where in the first line, and make it easy to call or ask for a bid.
Key takeaways
- 2 of 19 construction homepages loaded their main content in 2.5 seconds or less on a phone: Tampa Bay General Contractors (2.3 s) and Evans General Contractors (2.4 s). The slowest took 37.8 seconds.
- 6 of 19 have no tap-to-call link on the homepage, including Evans, one of the two fastest.
- Only 5 have a form on the homepage, and none has chat.
- Only 2 headlines name the trade and the city. Most use a slogan like “Your Trusted Partner.”
- You can test your own site in 2 minutes. The steps are below.
How we tested these 19 construction websites
Most “best construction website” lists judge sites by a desktop screenshot. Owners, developers, homeowners and subcontractors often check a builder on a phone first, from a job site or between meetings, so we tested what they get. Every test ran on November 13, 2026.
- Speed: we ran each homepage through Google PageSpeed Insights on the mobile setting, once per site. We recorded the performance score (0 to 100) and how many seconds the main content took to show (Google calls this Largest Contentful Paint). Google counts 2.5 seconds or less as good. One test is a snapshot, and results move a little from run to run.
- Ways to reach them: we opened each homepage in Chrome and checked for a tap-to-call phone link, a form with a phone, email or message field, and a chat or text widget. This is a homepage check only. A phone number shown as plain text doesn’t count.
- The list: 7 are construction companies from the earlier version of this post. The other 12 are the first local general contractor website in Google’s results for “general contractor” plus a city, in 12 cities across the country. We skipped directories and national builders, because their sites aren’t built to win local work. None is a Demand & Convert client.
Results at a glance

| # | Construction company | Where | Mobile score | Main content shows in | Tap-to-call | Form | Chat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tampa Bay General Contractors | Tampa, FL | 92 | 2.3 s | Yes | No | No |
| 2 | Evans General Contractors | Atlanta, GA | 85 | 2.4 s | No | No | No |
| 3 | Gibson Custom Construction | Charlotte, NC | 90 | 3.0 s | Yes | No | No |
| 4 | Hammer & Hand | Portland, OR and Seattle, WA | 78 | 5.5 s | Yes | Yes | No |
| 5 | Tidal Construction Group | Commercial | 65 | 7.8 s | Yes | Yes | No |
| 6 | Jen The Builder | Phoenix, AZ | 74 | 8.8 s | No | No | No |
| 7 | Mehrer Drywall | Seattle, WA | 67 | 9.3 s | Yes | No | No |
| 8 | Eberson Construction | Northern Arizona | 65 | 13.1 s | Yes | No | No |
| 9 | Artisan Build Construct | Nashville, TN | 59 | 14.8 s | No | No | No |
| 10 | Russell | St. Louis, MO | 51 | 16.4 s | No | Yes | No |
| 11 | Good Life Construction | Sacramento, CA | 47 | 16.7 s | Yes | No | No |
| 12 | ASI General Contractors | Commercial | 43 | 16.9 s | Yes | No | No |
| 13 | M Scott Construction | Katy, TX | 52 | 18.1 s | Yes | No | No |
| 14 | Greystone Construction | Houston, TX | 64 | 18.9 s | Yes | No | No |
| 15 | McGough | Minneapolis, MN | 32 | 27.7 s | No | Yes | No |
| 16 | Yerba Buena Engineering & Construction | San Francisco, CA | 46 | 28.3 s | Yes | No | No |
| 17 | Jordy Construction | Denver, CO | 65 | 31.8 s | No | No | No |
| 18 | Peepels Mechanical | New York, NY | 47 | 34.7 s | Yes | Yes | No |
| 19 | Cerris Builders | Kansas City | 55 | 37.8 s | Yes | No | No |

The fastest construction websites (under 2.5 seconds, or close)
Two sites cleared Google’s bar, and one more missed it by half a second. None of the three has a form on the homepage.
1. Tampa Bay General Contractors
tampabaygeneralcontractors.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 92, main content in 2.3 s, tap-to-call yes, form no, chat no.
The fastest site in the test. The domain and page title say exactly who they are and where, and the phone number is linked 3 times. The headline, “Proven. Recognized. Trusted.”, is a slogan, so the trade and city only show in the page title and further down.
2. Evans General Contractors
evansgeneralcontractors.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 85, main content in 2.4 s, tap-to-call no, form no, chat no.
An Atlanta general contractor with a fast homepage. A phone visitor has no number to tap and no form to fill in on the homepage, so they have to find the contact page first. Adding a linked phone number would cost nothing in speed.
3. Gibson Custom Construction
gibsoncustomconstruction.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 90, main content in 3.0 s, tap-to-call yes, form no, chat no.
A Charlotte builder doing residential and commercial work, with a page title that reads “General Contractor in Charlotte, NC.” The phone number is linked 6 times, and testimonials sit on the homepage. It’s the best all-round model in this list.
Good, but slower on phones (2.5 to 10 seconds)
These four sites are within reach of a fast load. Two of them have the only homepage forms in the faster half of the list.
4. Hammer & Hand
hammerandhand.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 78, main content in 5.5 s, tap-to-call yes, form yes, chat no.
The fastest site in the test with a homepage form, plus 4 call links. It builds custom homes and commercial projects in Portland and Seattle. The homepage has no H1 heading at all, which leaves Google to guess its main topic from the page title.
5. Tidal Construction Group
tidalconstructiongroup.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 65, main content in 7.8 s, tap-to-call yes, form yes, chat no.
A commercial and design-build contractor with the most call links in the test (7) and 2 forms. The headline, “Building Excellence From the Ground Up,” could belong to any builder. Naming the work and the region would help both visitors and Google.
6. Jen The Builder
jenthebuilder.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 74, main content in 8.8 s, tap-to-call no, form no, chat no.
A Phoenix licensed general contractor with residential and commercial work. “Fall in Love with Your Home” speaks to homeowners, but the homepage has no tap-to-call link and no form.
7. Mehrer Drywall
mehrer.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 67, main content in 9.3 s, tap-to-call yes, form no, chat no.
A specialty subcontractor rather than a general contractor, and a good example for that kind of firm. “Building Excellence For Over 60 Years” puts its history first, and the phone number is linked 6 times.
Strong companies, slow on phones (over 10 seconds)
Most of the list is here, including large firms with big project portfolios. Full-screen video, large project photos and many outside scripts all add time before a phone visitor sees anything.
8. Eberson Construction
ebersonconstruction.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 65, main content in 13.1 s, tap-to-call yes, form no, chat no.
The page title, “Northern Arizona’s Premier Design-Build Firm,” names the region and the delivery method. The headline is just the company name, and the phone number is linked once.
9. Artisan Build Construct
artisanbuildconstruct.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 59, main content in 14.8 s, tap-to-call no, form no, chat no.
The best headline in the test: “Residential + Commercial General Contractor in Nashville.” It says what they do, for whom and where. The homepage has no tap-to-call link or form, and it takes almost 15 seconds to show on a phone.
10. Russell
russellco.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 51, main content in 16.4 s, tap-to-call no, form yes, chat no.
“Commercial General Contractor and Real Estate Developer in the Midwest” is a clear first headline, but the page uses 3 H1 headings in all. It has 2 forms and no tap-to-call link.
11. Good Life Construction
goodlifeconstruction.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 47, main content in 16.7 s, tap-to-call yes, form no, chat no.
“General Contractor in Sacramento, CA” is the exact search a customer types, used as the headline. The phone number is linked 5 times. Speed is what holds it back.
12. ASI General Contractors
asigc.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 43, main content in 16.9 s, tap-to-call yes, form no, chat no.
A commercial general contractor whose headline, “Building Excellence in Commercial Construction,” appears twice on the page as two H1s. One clear H1 that names the region would be a quick fix.
13. M Scott Construction
mscottconstruction.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 52, main content in 18.1 s, tap-to-call yes, form no, chat no.
A commercial builder based in Katy, Texas. “Redefining Commercial Construction in Texas” names the work and the state, and the phone number is linked 4 times.
14. Greystone Construction
greystoneconstruction.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 64, main content in 18.9 s, tap-to-call yes, form no, chat no.
The page title lists every sector it serves: commercial, industrial, multifamily and agriculture. The headline is only “Your Trusted Partner.” Moving the page title’s wording into the headline would tell visitors more at a glance.
15. McGough
mcgough.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 32, main content in 27.7 s, tap-to-call no, form yes, chat no.
A large Minneapolis builder of industrial, advanced tech and commercial projects. Its score of 32 was the lowest in the test. The homepage has a form but no tap-to-call link.
16. Yerba Buena Engineering & Construction
yerba-buena.net. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 46, main content in 28.3 s, tap-to-call yes, form no, chat no.
A San Francisco engineering and construction firm. The homepage’s H1 heading is empty, so neither visitors nor Google get a main headline. The phone number is linked 4 times.
17. Jordy Construction
jordyconstruction.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 65, main content in 31.8 s, tap-to-call no, form no, chat no.
“Colorado’s Trusted Commercial General Contractor” is a strong headline. A score of 65 looks fine, but the main content took almost 32 seconds to show, which is why the load time matters more than the score. There’s no tap-to-call link or form on the homepage.
18. Peepels Mechanical
peepels.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 47, main content in 34.7 s, tap-to-call yes, form yes, chat no.
“Your Trusted Mechanical Contractor Since 1928” names the trade and nearly a century of history. It has a form and 5 call links, but the main content takes almost 35 seconds on a phone.
19. Cerris Builders
cerrisbuilders.com. Tested Nov 13, 2026: score 55, main content in 37.8 s, tap-to-call yes, form no, chat no.
A Kansas City design-build firm with a project portfolio on the homepage and 5 call links. It was the slowest site in the test, and the headline, “Building For What Lies Ahead,” doesn’t say what or where.
What the best construction websites have in common
- The main content shows fast on a phone. Only 2 of 19 did it in 2.5 seconds, so a fast site stands out.
- A headline that says what you build and where. “Residential + Commercial General Contractor in Nashville” beats “Your Trusted Partner.” Only 2 of 19 did this.
- One clear H1. In our test, one homepage had no H1, one had an empty H1, and two had more than one.
- The phone number is one tap away. 6 of 19 homepages had no tap-to-call link.
- A short way to start a project or ask for a bid, on the homepage, not three clicks away. Only 5 of 19 had a form there.
- Light project media. Big photos and video sell construction work, but they need to be compressed and loaded after the first screen.
Construction website must-haves
Construction buyers range from homeowners to developers and facility managers. Whoever they are, these pages and sections answer what they want to know:
- Projects by type: a portfolio sorted by the work you want more of, such as residential, commercial, industrial, multifamily or heavy civil, with the location and scope of each job.
- Sectors and services: a page for each, so a buyer can find their kind of job and Google can match each page to a search.
- How you deliver: design-build, general contracting or construction management, explained in plain words.
- License, insurance and safety: your license numbers, coverage and safety program, stated plainly.
- A way to start: a tap-to-call number and a short project or bid request form.
- For subcontractors: a bid or prequalification page, kept apart from the customer path.
- Service area: the cities and regions you build in.
- Reviews and client quotes, ideally from Google.
Want this built for you? See how we approach construction and contractor website design and websites for home builders, or browse finished sites in our design gallery.
How to test your own construction website
- Open Google PageSpeed Insights, paste your homepage address, and run the test.
- Stay on the Mobile tab and find “Largest Contentful Paint.” 2.5 seconds or less is good. Look at this number, not just the score: one site in our test scored 65 but took almost 32 seconds.
- Open your homepage on your own phone. Can you tap the phone number? Can you start a project or request a bid in a few taps?
- Read your headline out loud. Does it say what you build and where?
Or run our free website speed test, which explains the results in plain English. If your site is fast but the phone still doesn’t ring, the problem is usually being found, not the site. Our free general contractor Local SEO playbook covers how contractors get into the Google map results, and our remodeling and general contractor SEO page explains how we help them rank.
What a construction website costs
Our Lead Gen Website is free with any of our marketing systems. Local SEO runs from $499 to $1,500 a month (Starter, Growth and Premium), and every Local SEO package starts with a 60-day free trial. Ad spend is always separate. See our pricing.
More website tests for contractors
- Home builder websites, tested for speed and leads
- Remodeling websites, tested for speed and leads
- Roofing websites, tested for speed and leads
- Plumbing websites, tested for speed and leads
- Tree service websites, tested for speed and leads
- Solar websites, tested for speed and leads
- Window and door websites, tested for speed and leads
Frequently asked questions
What makes a good construction website?
A good construction website loads its main content in 2.5 seconds or less on a phone, says what you build and where in the headline, and has a tap-to-call number and a short project or bid form on the homepage. It also shows real projects by type, your license and insurance, and reviews.
How fast should a construction website load?
The main content should show in 2.5 seconds or less on a phone, which is Google’s line for a good load. In our test of 19 construction homepages, only 2 met it, and 12 took longer than 10 seconds.
What pages should a construction company website have?
A homepage, a page for each service or sector you want more of, a project portfolio, a page for each main area you serve, an about page with your license, insurance and safety program, a reviews page, and a contact page with a short project or bid request form. Add a subcontractor bid page if you hire trades.
Should a commercial contractor’s website have a form?
Yes. Commercial buyers often want to send project details or plans rather than call. Only 5 of the 19 construction homepages we tested had a form. Keep it short, make it work on a phone, and offer a phone number next to it.
How do I check my construction website’s speed?
Put your homepage into Google PageSpeed Insights, keep the Mobile tab selected, and look at Largest Contentful Paint. You can also use our free website speed test, which explains the result in plain English.
Keep reading
This guide is part of our Building a Website That Books Jobs series. Want us to handle this for your business? See our service: Contractor Website Design .
